Popular Post Xplosiv Posted July 16, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted July 16, 2018 (edited) You must first login or register to see more! Release date: 2007 Edited March 11, 2020 by Xplosiv 14 2 Link to comment
Xplosiv Posted July 16, 2018 Author Share Posted July 16, 2018 You must first login or register to see more! Link to comment
Xplosiv Posted July 16, 2018 Author Share Posted July 16, 2018 @Ganjastep I need you once moar 1 Link to comment
Ganjastep Posted July 16, 2018 Share Posted July 16, 2018 19 minutes ago, Xplosiv said: 1st post This one is not lossless. Super obvious because of the filter at 16Khz. Remember, sound doesn't stop abruptly. Imagine throwing a rock into a still pond. The ripples won't just stop abruptly unless something is there to stop them. Same concept with sound 16 minutes ago, Xplosiv said: 2nd post This one is lossless Notice no 16khz shelf? Fun fact: notice how the sounds weaken at 15.5khz? See how none of the colors (graphic representations of sound) end abruptly and dissipate over a few khz? This is from the production process. 1 1 Link to comment
Xplosiv Posted July 16, 2018 Author Share Posted July 16, 2018 The thing that made me doubt here because the non-lossess seem to be more 'green' or greener. Could be that they upped the volume when converting? 1 Link to comment
Ganjastep Posted July 16, 2018 Share Posted July 16, 2018 Just now, Xplosiv said: The thing that made me doubt here because the non-lossess seem to be more 'green' or greener. Could be that they upped the volume when converting? Boosting of the midrange is common when filtering out the higher. It's an attempt to make the removal of the highend less noticeable 1 Link to comment
Xplosiv Posted July 16, 2018 Author Share Posted July 16, 2018 1 minute ago, Ganjastep said: Boosting of the midrange is common when filtering out the higher. It's an attempt to make the removal of the highend less noticeable OK. Thanks again for the clarification. Fixed the link! 1 Link to comment
Ganjastep Posted July 16, 2018 Share Posted July 16, 2018 2 minutes ago, Xplosiv said: OK. Thanks again for the clarification. Fixed the link! Anytime Link to comment
Mephistopheles Posted July 16, 2018 Share Posted July 16, 2018 So I've lived so many years not realising this was a Thomas Bangalter edit? omg I'm stupid Link to comment
Xplosiv Posted July 16, 2018 Author Share Posted July 16, 2018 2 minutes ago, Mephistopheles said: So I've lived so many years not realising this was a Thomas Bangalter edit? omg I'm stupid I suppose you do know who he is, right? Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now