Jump to content

Funtcase - Unknown (v3)


Kryptica

Recommended Posts

Yeah because someone that doesn't understand how codecs work is retarded right?

derrrrp

Acting like you know what your talking about when you are totally uneducated on the matter is very retarded, yes.

"Artist gave out song? Peaks at 22khz instead of 20khz? It's a transcode boost" (facepalm)

derpaderp son.

Link to comment
Acting like you know what your talking about when you are totally uneducated on the matter is very retarded, yes.

"Artist gave out song? Peaks at 22khz instead of 20khz? It's a transcode boost" (facepalm)

derpaderp son.

No ones called it a boost - First fail

There is no obvious proof of what it was encoded with in the tags - Second Fail

Explain why some lossless tunes share the same hideous spek appearance, considering theres no mp3 encoding included

Link to comment
you guys are mixing up mastering and mixing down, a good tune should sound good regardless of whether it has been mastered. mastering a tune doesn't just magically add high end where there was none to begin with...

true words right here.

if a tune peaks at 16khz unmastered this would mean he's using 22.050khZ Samples from what i cant think of ^^

he's just trollin ^^

Link to comment

yea i admit i dont know pretty much anything about mastering/mixdowns/production at all, all i was saying is the spek doesnt look pretty, and that it was and old tune and that probably had something to do with it. but you cant complain with a free tune, especially a funtcase tune, i mean the last song we got from him besides remixes was 50 calibre correct me if im wrong

Link to comment

Ok i understand that this is a big topic for alot of people, but lets not flood this thread. This discussion is about spek's and mastering, not funtcase. Feel free to continue your argument here. http://www.edmc.nu/producing/412829-help-me-my-spek.html or start a new discussion thread, otherwise chill ya bloodclat pieces and stop bitchin.

- edit Ran i through audacity, tried to level some of the highs and increase the bass slightly.

Edited by ChiefKronic
Link to comment
it was saved with fhg codec instead of LAME. god you people are retarded as hell.
No ones called it a boost - First fail

There is no obvious proof of what it was encoded with in the tags - Second Fail

Explain why some lossless tunes share the same hideous spek appearance, considering theres no mp3 encoding included

This tune is encoded in FhG. If people are used to LAME encodes, FhG encodes can look a bit weird. This is why you should use your ears as a guide and only use spek as a quick check or a backup. I personally much prefer LAME but what you gonna do

Link to comment
Move to request,im think,btw huge track.

seeing as this track is straight from funty, theres no point in moving it to requests because its clearly the best version anyone could get.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...